Placeholder Content Image

Ted Lasso star ordered to pay massive child support sum

<p>Jason Sudeikis has been ordered to pay ex Olivia Wilde an enormous sum of child support, as a bitter two-year custody battle draws to a close. </p> <p>According to new court filings obtained by <em><a href="https://pagesix.com/2023/09/25/jason-sudeikis-and-olivia-wilde-settle-custody-battle-actor-to-pay-27500-per-month/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Page Six</a></em>, the<em> Ted Lasso</em> star has allegedly agreed to pay his ex $27,500 ($A42,800) per month in child support for their two kids, Otis, 9, and Daisy, 6. </p> <p>The hefty settlement has been based on Sudeikis' reported 2023 income of $10.5 million ($A16.3 million) and Wilde’s estimated income of $500,000 ($A778,000).</p> <p>“The parties agree that child support for the minor children in the amount of $27,500 per month is sufficient to maintain the needs of the minor children considering Jason’s station in life … is consistent with each child’s best interest, and application of the guideline would be unjust or inappropriate in this case,” the court papers reportedly state.</p> <p>The legal proceedings began two years ago, and took a dramatic turn in 2022 when Wilde, who was promoting her new movie <em>Don't Worry Darling</em> at the time, was served legal papers while on stage delivering a speech at CinemaCon. </p> <p>At the time, a source told <em><a href="https://pagesix.com/2022/04/29/olivia-wilde-mortified-after-being-served-with-legal-papers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Page Six</a></em> that Wilde was mortified over the brazen act. </p> <p>“It seemed unthinkable to her, and it took a moment to set in, but as mortifying as it was, she did not want to give a reaction,” the insider explained.</p> <p>Since then, things have improved for the couple, as they were both seen putting on a united front at Otis' soccer game in LA. </p> <p>Wilde and Sudeikis started dating in November 2011 and got engaged in January 2013. They welcomed their two kids before separating in November 2020.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Tragedy in Texas: 3 people in custody after 46 migrants found dead inside truck

<p>Three people have been taken into custody in Texas after the bodies of 46 migrants were found dead in a truck. </p> <p>Authorities are continuing to work at the scene in San Antonio's south-west where the vehicle was found with the 46 people dead inside, according to Fire Chief Charles Hood. </p> <p>Sixteen people, including 12 adults and four children, were found alive and have been rushed to hospital.</p> <p>Chief Hood added that the survivors were all suffering heat-related injuries. </p> <p>Mexico's Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard confirmed two of the survivors were from Guatemala.</p> <p>The truck was found next to railway track in a remote area of San Antonio, as Ebrard confirmed the vehicle had EU number plates designed to circulate without inspection.</p> <p>"Very likely the responsibility of traffickers," he said.</p> <p>San Antonio Police Chief William McManus said a worker nearby heard a cry for help around 5pm Texas time and went to investigate.</p> <p>"(They) found a trailer with the doors partially open and opened them up to take a look and found a number of deceased individuals inside," McManus said.</p> <p>Chief Hood said one body was discovered outside the truck, with the remainder of the deceased people being found inside the trailer. </p> <p>McManus said three people have been taken into custody however it is not clear whether they are "absolutely connected or not".</p> <p>He also added the tragedy is now a federal investigation as police officials work to determine an official cause of death. </p> <p>San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg called it a "horrific human tragedy".</p> <p>"We hope those who are responsible for putting these people in such inhumane conditions are prosecuted to the full extent of the law," he said.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

NSW Police blasted after joining TikTok

<p dir="ltr">TikTok has become the home of influencers, brands, creatives and even zoos, but the NSW Police haven’t received as warm a welcome on the platform as they might have expected.</p> <p dir="ltr">Despite gaining popularity for their law-related memes and posts on Facebook, the organisation’s debut on TikTok has seen them be called out for issues including police violence, Indigenous deaths in police custody, and the rates of domestic violence in the force.</p> <p dir="ltr">Less than a month after starting the @nswpolice TikTok account, users have been taking advantage of the platform’s ‘duet’ feature (which allows users to create videos that play next to the original video) to address these issues.</p> <p dir="ltr">Ben Vance, a 26-year-old digital marketing coordinator in Sydney, has even been blocked by the account after duetting their videos with less-than-flattering headlines involving the police.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I thought, ‘This is the perfect time to air out some bad laundry’,” he told <em><a href="https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stefficao/nsw-police-blocks-tiktok-duets" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Buzzfeed News</a></em>.</p> <p dir="ltr">Some of the videos show officers acting out funny skits about their law enforcement tactics, with one viral clip showing an officer responding to the question, ‘How do we keep the roads safe this long weekend?’ with a cartoon filter overlaid with text reading, “DOUBLE DEMERITS”.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Can’t say we didn’t warn you,” the caption reads.</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-9a24f7f6-7fff-dd8f-e933-df4b97b1655f">Mr Vance <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@easymoneyvancey" target="_blank" rel="noopener">duetted</a> that clip with a video of himself smiling over a screenshot from the Australian Institute of Criminology’s report that reveals there were almost 500 Indigenous deaths reported in police custody in the last 30 years.</span></p> <p><img src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/2022/04/tiktok-nswpolice.jpg" alt="" width="1280" height="720" /></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Ben Vance has been praised for pointing out issues involving the police, who have since blocked him on the platform. Image: @easymoneyvancey (TikTok)</em></p> <p dir="ltr">Mr Vance has had his own takes go viral, with supportive comments telling him he is “doing god's work” flooding in and messages from people sharing their frustrations with the police.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I’ve gotten people reaching out to me in my TikTok comments and DMs (direct messages) telling me they were 16, walking into a music festival, and strip-searched because they ‘looked like a drug dealer’,” he told the outlet.</p> <p dir="ltr">Though he said he didn’t intend to start “a beef with the police”, he thought it was a good opportunity to hold them accountable.</p> <p dir="ltr">“There’s a lack of accountability reporting in this country with the news media being owned by a select few people, and this information isn’t very well publicised,” he said.</p> <p dir="ltr">The double demerits clip isn’t the only one of NSW Police’s videos to be used to criticise the force, and Mr Vance isn’t the only person to be blocked as a result of their criticisms. </p> <p dir="ltr">Taken from the perspective of two officers tapping on a computer screen, it features the text: “POV: you’re looking up someone in the system who was using their phone while driving without a licence and speeding in an unregistered vehicle with two bald tyres and no working tail lights, wondering how they thought they would get away with it”.</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-d57e00c0-7fff-00fb-7db5-d453298ce1dc"></span></p> <p dir="ltr">User @<a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@biglublyleanne?lang=en" target="_blank" rel="noopener">biglublyleanne</a> responded to that clip, mimicking the officers with the caption, “POV: you’re writing an incident report after killing another Black Australian”, written over the top.</p> <p><img src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/2022/04/tiktok-cops1.jpg" alt="" width="1280" height="720" /></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>TikTok user @biglublyleanne was also blocked shortly after pointing out the issue of Indigenous deaths in custody. Image: @biglublyleanne (TikTok)</em></p> <p dir="ltr">On the same day, the user revealed they had also been blocked by the account.</p> <p dir="ltr">“You can give Indigenous people the heat mercilessly but can’t take it,” they wrote in the caption.</p> <p dir="ltr">As of publication, interactive options that allow users to duet or stitch videos are no longer available - but preventing people from sharing their clips has just increased the backlash.</p> <p dir="ltr">A more recent clip about Ed, the tabby police cat that features prominently on the organisation’s Facebook page, has received comments asking for the features to be turned back on, while some joked that the page would soon prevent people from commenting too.</p> <p dir="ltr">“The police thinking they can come on tiktok and not be dragged,” one user wrote.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Don’t be shy, turn duets and stitches back on,” another said.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Imagine blocking people who are exercising freedom of speech - I thought criticism of government bodies was legal, guess not,” a third argued.</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-0c36875b-7fff-2075-379a-00b334b382c9"></span></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: @easymoneyvancey (TikTok)</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Aunt "refuses" to take on kids when her terminally ill sister dies

<p>A woman has "refused" to take on her terminally ill sister's children when she passes away, despite her sister begging her to, and her decision has gone viral. </p> <p>In a lengthy post to Reddit, the woman revealed that her older sister, 31, has recently been diagnosed with a large brain tumour that will drastically shorten her life. </p> <p>The woman's sister has a six-year-old, a two-year-old and a newborn baby, who she claims she doesn't have anyone other than her sister to leave them to. </p> <p>Her sister asked her to be the sole carer of her children, despite her and her husband, both 25, deciding to remain child-free. </p> <p>"We don't have family, and her ex-husband wants nothing to do with the kids since she cheated on him for years with many men and they aren't his. She doesn't know who the dad is," the woman explains.</p> <p>The woman then goes on to list the many reasons why she told her sister "no".</p> <p>"1. Since we are both child-free it would be unfair to ask my husband to make this kind of sacrifice. We both agreed to no kids when we got married; to change something like that generally means a divorce."</p> <p>"2. I am an atheist. My sister wants me to raise them religiously and to 'know god' and take them to church. No."</p> <p>She goes on to say that she was never very close with her sister, due to their six-year age difference, and that the memories she has of their childhood aren't so sweet.</p> <p>"[From] the memories I do have, she was always awful to me, [and] cynical...After she moved out at 18 we haven't talked once, besides at my parents funeral. I don't even know her kids, let alone her," she writes.</p> <p>Unsurprisingly, her terminally ill sister did not take her refusal well. </p> <p>"She cried and called me 'awful' but it's my life, and ultimately I get to be selfish with it..."</p> <p>"A child isn't an 18-year commitment; it's lifelong, and one I have decided not to take."</p> <p>The woman explains that since she told her sister "no", she has been bombarded with vicious messages from her sister's friends. </p> <p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 16px 0px 20px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: 'Proxima Nova', system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Fira Sans', 'Droid Sans', 'Helvetica Neue'; font-size: 18px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 28px; vertical-align: baseline; caret-color: #333333; color: #333333;"><span style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant-caps: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">"Friends of hers whom I've never met have been reaching out to me and calling me at all hours to leave nasty voice mails.</span></p> <p>"[They say] I need to step up as a sister, but I just feel like she's trying to use me as her ticket out to dying and not feeling guilty," she wrote.</p> <p>The post has since gone viral on the social media website, with most commenters siding with the woman. </p> <p>One person said, "I've worked with kids for the past 20+ years and I can tell you that one of the worst things for a kid is to be with a parent who can't/doesn't want to be a parent."</p> <p>Another commented, "If you don't know these children at all, I don't see why your sister would want you to be their guardian. How could they possibly be comfortable with you after the loss of their mother? These so-called friends of hers would be better suited if they have an established relationship with the children."</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

The crazy reason why Harry and Meghan won’t have custody of their own children

<p>While living the royal life can seem like a dream for some, the truth is, there are many bizarre rules that average people are lucky to not have to follow. One of them, in particular, has to do with the royal children.</p> <p>It’s hard enough raising children in the spotlight, with paparazzi constantly on your tail and having to figure out creative ways for them to behave during official royal events. But the most peculiar is the custody arrangement with the Queen.</p> <p>Despite how much of a royalist you claim to be, there is a chance that you skipped over this fine detail. According to royal historians, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge do not have legal custody of their own children.</p> <p>That right is given to the children’s great-grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II.</p> <p>Royal expert Marlene Koenig spoke to <em><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/bizarre-reason-why-meghan-and-harry-wont-have-custody-of-their-children/news-story/5070826afa1e1869db31304d4674bd3b" target="_blank">news.com.au</a></em> and said: “The sovereign has legal custody of the minor grandchildren.</p> <p>“This goes back to King George I [who ruled in the early 1700s], and the law’s never been changed. He did it because he had a very poor relationship with his son the future King George II, so they had this law passed that meant the King was the guardian of his grandchildren.”</p> <p>With the law dating back 300 years, it was passed by a majority of 10 out of 12 judges in the year 1717, who ultimately came to the decision that the monarch should have the “right of supervision extended to his grandchildren and this right of right belongs to His Majesty, King of the Realm, even during their father’s lifetime”.</p> <p>Koenig, who has written two books on the history of the British royal family and has had multiple articles published in the <em>Eurohistory Journal</em>, says the law has not changed since 1772, as the law was legislated again during King George III’s reign and has not been suspended by new legislation.</p> <p>Due to this, the upbringing of royal children is greatly affected especially when it comes to their upbringing, travel and education.</p> <p>“When [Princes William and Harry] were little, Prince Charles asked the Queen if both children could fly on a plane to Scotland, to which the Queen said yes,” Koenig said.</p> <p>“Technically, they needed permission for travel. The Queen has the last word on parenting decisions like that.”</p> <p>And that wasn’t the only time the Queen was asked for her approval.</p> <p>Before her passing, Princess Diana was not allowed to fly with her children to Australia as per the Queen's refusal. Also, later Prince Charles was forced to ask for the Queen’s permission before sending Prince William to a holiday camp in America in the late 1990s.</p> <p>According to Koenig, once the Queen passes, Prince Charles would then be handed the legal custody of George, Charlotte, Louis and all other grandchildren as he would then be king.</p> <p>But due to Prince Charles having progressive views, Koenig believes he is “very respectful of his son’s parenting” and would not choose to interfere in their upbringing.</p> <p>“He understands they want to raise their children privately … the only thing Charles might ask for is more pictures,” she joked.</p>

Legal