Placeholder Content Image

Newly approved Alzheimer’s drug raises serious concerns

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">United States health officials have approved the first new drug to treat Alzheimer’s in twenty years.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But independent advisors and some Alzheimer’s experts have said the approval comes without enough evidence that the drug can help patients with the brain-destroying disease.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Food and Drug Administration said it approved the drug, aducanumab, based on results that its benefits for Alzheimer’s patients were “reasonably likely”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Aducanuman, which will go by the brand name Aduhelmm, is produced by American biotechnology company Biogen and is to be administered as a monthly infusion.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As the first approved treatment to directly attack the disease process of Alzheimer’s instead of just treating the symptoms like anxiety and insomnia, the drug is intended to slow the cognitive decline in those with mild memory and thinking problems.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The drug is thought to reduce harmful clumps of plaque in the brain in order to slow the progression of the deadly disease.</span></p> <p><strong>Why this matters</strong></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">With the approval of the treatment despite limited evidence that it works, experts are concerned it could set a precedent for the approval of future experimental therapies that only show incremental benefits.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Currently only five medications have been approved by the FDA for patients with Alzheimer’s, though these only delay cognitive decline for several months.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As a result, patient advocacy groups lobbied for approval to expand the number of treatments available of Aduhelm, with other more-promising candidates likely to be three to four years away from potential approval.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But, the FDA advisory committee, as well as an independent think tank and several prominent experts - including Alzheimer’s doctors who were involved in clinical trials of the drug - have said the evidence raises doubts about its effectiveness. Concerns have also been raised about the small benefits being outweighed by the risk of swelling or bleeding in the brain that occurred during the trials.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The risk of bleeding is also heightened for those with the APOE4 gene, which is associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Caleb Alexander, an FDA advisor who recommended against the drug’s approval, said he was “surprised and disappointed”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The FDA gets the respect that it does because it has regulatory standards that are based on firm evidence. In this case, I think they gave the product a pass,” said Dr Alexander, a medical researcher at John Hopkins University.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr Patrizia Cavazzoni, the FDA’s director of the Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research wrote on the agency’s website: “The data included in the applicant’s submission were highly complex and left residual uncertainties regarding clinical benefit,” </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But, she said the agency had approved the drug through a program called accelerated approval, which is designed to provide earlier access to therapies for diseases with few treatments, “and where there is an expectation of clinical benefit despite some residual uncertainty regarding the benefit.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr Cavazzoni also told reporters: “The data supports patients and caregivers having the choice to use this drug.”</span></p> <p><strong>What happens next</strong></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Though approved, the FDA has required the drug manufacturer to conduct a follow-up study to confirm the benefits. If this study fails to show the drug's effectiveness, the FDA can - but isn’t required to - withdraw the drug from the market.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Biogen has said it aims to complete the follow-up trial by 2030.</span></p> <p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Image: Getty Images</span></em></p>

Body

Placeholder Content Image

Antibacterial soap banned in the US due to health fears

<p>There’s long been debate about the effectiveness of antibacterial soap, but the US Food and Drug Administration may have put a stop to arguments for good, banning their use due to the risk of “long-term harm” to health.</p> <p>The FDA looked at 19 ingredients in particular, including the two most commonly used in consumer soaps – triclosan and triclocarban – and concluded that antibacterials had the potential to damage the immune system.</p> <p>“Consumers may think antibacterial washes are more effective at preventing the spread of germs, but we have no scientific evidence that they are any better than plain soap and water,” director of the FDA drugs division Janet Woodcock said. “In fact, some data suggests that antibacterial ingredients may do more harm than good over the long-term.”</p> <p>The ban extends to around 40 per cent of antibacterial soap available to consumers, but does not affect those used in hospitals and medical practices.</p> <p>Not everyone is convinced with the FDA’s findings, however, with the American Cleaning Institute arguing that the antibacterial ingredients were in fact safe. “Antibacterial soaps are critical to public health because of the importance hand hygiene plays in the prevention of infection,” the ACI said in a statement. “Washing the hands with an antiseptic soap can help reduce the risk of infection beyond that provided by washing with non-antibacterial soap and water.”</p> <p>What do you think about the ban? Should New Zealand follow in the US’ footsteps? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.</p> <p><strong>Related links:</strong></p> <p><a href="/news/news/2016/09/why-you-should-not-eat-after-7pm/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong>Why you shouldn’t eat dinner after 7pm</strong></em></span></a></p> <p><a href="/news/news/2016/09/why-you-should-never-put-lemon-slices-in-your-drinks/"><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Why you should never put lemon slices in your drinks</span></em></strong></a></p> <p><a href="/news/news/2016/08/food-has-more-salt-in-it-than-a-big-mac/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong>This food has more salt in it than a Big Mac</strong></em></span></a></p>

News