Placeholder Content Image

Papa Swift vs Paparazzi: Taylor Swift's dad accused of assault

<p>In the midst of celebrations marking the conclusion of Taylor Swift's Eras tour in Sydney, an unexpected and troubling incident has emerged involving her father – Scott Swift.</p> <p>The 71-year-old has been accused of assaulting an Australian photographer, Ben McDonald, in the early hours of Tuesday morning at a Sydney wharf in Neutral Bay.</p> <p>According to reports confirmed by NSW Police, the alleged altercation occurred around 2:30am, following Taylor Swift's final performance in the city.</p> <p>It's said that Taylor and her father had been enjoying post-show festivities when the incident took place, tarnishing what should have been a joyous occasion.</p> <p>McDonald, who serves as the chief executive of Matrix Media Group, recounted the events to <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13128721/Taylor-Swift-father-Scott-assault-photographer-Sydney-wharf.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Daily Mail Australia</em></a>, shedding light on the confrontation. He stated that Taylor and Scott arrived at the wharf after travelling from Homebush on a luxury superyacht named <em>Quantum</em>.</p> <p>McDonald claims that after they disembarked, Scott allegedly 'charged' at him. McDonald originally thought that it was a security guard, and was surprised when he realised it was Taylor's dad.</p> <p>"In 23 years of taking pictures, I have never seen anything like it," he told the <em>Daily Mail</em>. "He probably decided he needed to defend his daughter, for some reason... She got off the boat, she walked towards security guards who were shoving umbrellas in our faces, and then he charged."</p> <p>Footage capturing the moments leading up to and following the alleged assault has surfaced, providing some insight into the incident. <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13128721/Taylor-Swift-father-Scott-assault-photographer-Sydney-wharf.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The video</a> shows Taylor and her father walking up from the wharf, shielded by large umbrellas held by security guards. Amid the commotion, McDonald attempted to capture the scene, and was obstructed by the guards protecting Taylor and her companions, including Mr Swift.</p> <p>In the aftermath, McDonald reported the incident to authorities. He did not sustain serious injuries, though he described experiencing discomfort and soreness on the left side of his face.</p> <p><em>Images: YouTube</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Dog people vs cat people: what your pet preference says about you

<p>Ask anybody whether they’re a cat or a dog person, and chances are, they’ve got a quick answer. But does your pet preference actually say much about your true personality? Well, there’s an increasing body of research that suggests it might.</p> <p><strong>Dog people are more extraverted</strong></p> <p>A 2010 study confirms the pervading cultural belief that dog people are more outgoing and social. Psychologist Sam Gosling at the University of Texas at Austin conducted a study with 4,500 participants answering questions that measured their personality inclinations among the Big Five personality traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. They also indicated whether they considered themselves a cat person, dog person, both or neither.</p> <p>Dog people scored higher on extraversion, agreeableness and conscientiousness whereas cat people were more neurotic and open, which in this context means creative, philosophical and open to non-traditional ways of thinking.</p> <p>“Once you know the findings, it kind of falls into place,” Gosling noted. “You think, of course, agreeableness and extraversion – dogs are companionable, they hang out, they like to be with you, they like your company, whereas cats like it for as long as they want it, and then they're off.”</p> <p><strong>Cat people scored higher in intelligence</strong></p> <p>In a 2014 study involving 600 college students led by Denise Guastello, an associate professor of psychology at Carroll University in Wisconsin, found dog owners were more lively, outgoing and rule-following, while cat owners are more introverted, sensitive, non-conformist and scored higher on intelligence tests.</p> <p>“It makes sense that a dog person is going to be more lively, because they’re going to want to be out there, outside, talking to people, bringing their dog,” said Guastello. “Whereas, if you’re more introverted, and sensitive, maybe you’re more at home reading a book, and your cat doesn’t need to go outside for a walk.”</p> <p>Interestingly, the study also found the different qualities the pet owners valued in their dogs or cats: 38 per cent of dog lovers reported companionship was the best quality of canines, while 45.6 per cent of cat lovers said affection was the top cat trait.</p> <p>However, ultimately these studies are of course, generalisations and the traits don’t apply to all dog owners or cat owners. And in the end, what does it matter – each pet owner loves animals and that in itself says a lot more about a person!</p> <p><em>Images: Getty</em></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Expectation vs reality: Reporters share inside look at what cruises are like now

<p dir="ltr">Four reporters have shared their experiences on some of the most popular cruising lines - revealing that their expectations weren’t quite met by the reality of their trip.</p> <p dir="ltr">For Joey Hadden, who booked her first ever cruise on the Royal Caribbean’s Wonder of the Seas, her sessions of relaxing in the sun came with unexpected crowds and difficulties in finding a chair.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I spent more time waiting in lines than I had anticipated. And I saw much of the world from behind other people's heads,” she wrote of her experience in <em><a href="https://www.insider.com/what-its-like-to-go-on-a-cruise-now-photos-2022-10#and-as-she-explored-more-of-the-ship-during-her-weeklong-stay-she-was-surprised-to-find-that-even-the-worlds-largest-cruise-ship-felt-overcrowded-at-times-6" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Insider</a></em>.</p> <p dir="ltr">She shared that when she first boarded the ship and excitedly went to watch the ocean as they sailed away from the port, that tall, thick glass and not being able to find a spot to stand stopped her from doing so.</p> <p dir="ltr">Fellow <em>Insider </em>reporter Monica Humphries said her experience with crowds aboard Carnival Vista, which was at partial capacity during her trip in July 2021, saw her waiting in long lines to disembark at each port and for help from the service desk.</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-34a72885-7fff-8bfa-d8da-1752b0965c73"></span></p> <p dir="ltr">Buffets were another source of contention and crowds for the two reporters, with Humphries also finding that issues with how food was labelled meant she accidentally ate meat twice despite asking what was in her food due to being pescatarian.</p> <blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/Ci2sCi_OmYu/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"> </div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"> <div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"> </div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/Ci2sCi_OmYu/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Amanda Krause (@amandalynn_14)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p dir="ltr">Mikhaila Friel, who sailed on the Queen Elizabeth, made the common mistake of sitting by herself on her first night in the dining room - not realising that wherever you sit becomes your table for the rest of the cruise.</p> <p dir="ltr">Surprising temperatures were another common experience, with Friel, Hadden, and Amanda Krause, who travelled on Disney Cruise Line’s Wish, finding that they hadn’t packed enough warm clothes.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Europe in the fall can be pretty chilly, so I wore a coat during my excursions in Amsterdam. However, I wish I'd brought a larger selection of warmer clothes and accessories to wear on outdoor areas of the ship that were affected by the wind, something I hadn't considered,” Friel wrote. </p> <p dir="ltr">“A woolly hat and a pair of gloves certainly wouldn't have gone amiss.”</p> <p dir="ltr">Krause, who had never travelled by ship before, hadn’t expected the chill that came from the cold air-conditioning inside the ship and wished she had brought warmer clothes to avoid shivering at restaurants and bars, as well as in the Walt Disney theatre.</p> <p dir="ltr">While they reported having an enjoyable time during their cruise experiences, each of the travellers encountered hiccoughs and disappointments that made them all the wiser.</p> <p dir="ltr"><span id="docs-internal-guid-f0becb41-7fff-b1b7-92ae-503f52e12a06"></span></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p>

Cruising

Placeholder Content Image

Hard vs soft luggage – which is better?

<p>Your suitcase will be your most faithful travel partner, so make sure you choose the right one.</p> <p><strong>1. How are you travelling?</strong></p> <p>When you’re checking your luggage in for a standard flight, it makes very little difference whether it’s hard or soft. But other modes of transport can be difficult with a hard suitcase. It’s much harder to fit in the back of a taxi or car, and it can be trickier to stow on a bus or train. If you’re taking flights on very small planes your luggage might be restricted even further and hard sided bags can even be banned, so read the fine print.</p> <p><strong>2. What are you taking?</strong></p> <p>Hard suitcases can provide more protection if you travel with a lot of breakables, like glass cosmetic bottles or electronics. It’s also good for flimsy souvenirs that you might pick up along the way. If you like to keep all your breakables in your carry on, then soft luggage should suit you fine.</p> <p><strong>3. Are you an organised packer (and unpacker)?</strong></p> <p>Soft suitcases will generally come with a few more internal pockets or dividers, allowing you to separate out your items. Hard suitcases tend to be a big empty space. If you like things to be organised, soft luggage is the best bet. Hard suitcases also take up more room than soft, so if you like to live out of your case on the floor of your hotel room (rather than hanging things up) you could find it gets in the way.</p> <p><strong>4. How often do you travel?</strong></p> <p>Hard luggage is more durable than soft and will usually stand up to the rough treatment of time in the cargo hold or being dragged around cobblestone streets. If you travel frequently, you’ll want your luggage to be able to survive multiple journeys without showing too much wear and tear.</p> <p><strong>5. Do you worry about security?</strong></p> <p>It can be easier to break into a soft suitcase, if only because thieves can simply slash the fabric sides. It’s not usually possible to do this to a hard suitcase, so you are giving yourself an extra layer of protection. However, keep in mind that a good travel lock will usually deter most opportunistic thieves, so most types of suitcase are relatively safe.</p> <p><em>Image: Getty</em></p>

Travel Tips

Placeholder Content Image

Elon Musk vs Russia

<p>Elon Musk is always ready for a fight. Even with a nation as powerful as Russia. But supplying his satellite internet service to Ukraine has opened up a whole new can of worms.</p> <p>Musk says his <a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/space/spacex-astronomers-warn-over-musks-planned-satellite-constellation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Starlink</a> signals are being jammed.</p> <p>About the same time, Russia’s space agency chief Dmitry Rogozin declared: “Offlining the satellites of any country is actually a casus belli, a cause for war.”</p> <p>So, could the clash between Musk’s commercial enterprise and Moscow’s military activities become a cause for escalation?</p> <p>It depends, says space law expert Duncan Blake. Space isn’t lawless, he says. But it is very murky. And it’s a legal and ethical challenge particularly relevant given Australia’s accelerating civil-military space launch and satellite program.</p> <p>Like most legal matters, there are issues of degree, intent and physical harm.</p> <p>International law is relatively clear in defining an “armed attack”. It’s based on the equivalence to a physical armed force seizing and holding a piece of strategic territory. Both electronic warfare (jamming signals) and cyber warfare (hacking functions) can cross that line.</p> <p>“Hopefully, neither the Russians nor anyone else is stupid enough to interfere with missile warning satellites because that would send a very bad message,” says Blake. “At the other end of the spectrum is interfering with something like a Superbowl broadcast. It’s enraging. It’s annoying. But it’s not an ‘armed attack’.”</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr" lang="en">Important warning: Starlink is the only non-Russian communications system still working in some parts of Ukraine, so probability of being targeted is high. Please use with caution.</p> <p>— Elona Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1499472139333746691?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2022</a></p></blockquote> <p>It would, however, be subject to international treaties and agreements. Electronic spectrums are regulated. Cybercrime is a matter of national law. Both are inherently hard to enforce, Blake says, and separating the two is getting harder.</p> <p>An attack on a commercial <a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/earth/agriculture/csiro-makes-satellite-eye-in-the-sky-available-for-aussie-earth-observation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Earth-observation</a> or space-awareness satellite would inevitably be seen as aggressive. But disabling a military spy satellite could be regarded as an act of war.</p> <div class="newsletter-box"> <div id="wpcf7-f6-p184577-o1" class="wpcf7" dir="ltr" lang="en-US" role="form"> </div> </div> <p>So what if your satellite is both?</p> <p>“Could it be a legitimate military target?” asks Blake. “Would it be lawful to target this satellite? The answer is yes to the first, maybe to the second”.</p> <p>For example, the Optus C1 communications satellite has several relay nodes dedicated to Australian military use. The remainder provides crucial communications links across Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Under Article 52 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, anything that offers a significant military contribution through its nature, location, purpose or use is a valid war target.</p> <p>But, says Blake, there are conditions.</p> <p>“If you’re going to target something, one precaution that must be taken into consideration is the constant care of the civilian populations. Another one is whether or not there was another target that would achieve the same military advantage without the effect on the civilian population.”</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr" lang="en">Some Starlink terminals near conflict areas were being jammed for several hours at a time. Our latest software update bypasses the jamming.</p> <p>Am curious to see what’s next!</p> <p>— Elona Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1500026380704178178?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2022</a></p></blockquote> <p>Musk is delivering his Starlink ground stations to Ukraine’s front lines. They ostensibly offer satellite broadband services to anyone who cares to use them. That can be for seeking humanitarian aid or medical assistance. It could also be to report Russian military movements.</p> <p>“You can imagine circumstances where those tests about what constitutes a lawful target might be satisfied from a Russian perspective,” says Blake.</p> <p>There are few international courts or tribunals equipped to deal with space disputes. The Permanent Court of Arbitration, based in The Hague, is one. It’s the same court that ruled against China’s claim to the Philippines’ islands in the South China Sea. (Beijing ignored the verdict.)</p> <p>“Obviously, it’d be nice if everybody complied with international humanitarian law, and also the international law on the use of force,” says Blake. “There are consequences for failing to comply. And there are plenty of reasons to comply.”</p> <p>Ultimately, though, it’s about who you are – and what you want to be.</p> <p>“People in the military are in the business of killing people and breaking things,” he says. “So what makes us different from criminals who kill people and break things? The thing that makes us different is the rule of law and doing all you can to minimise civilian harm.”</p> <p><img id="cosmos-post-tracker" style="opacity: 0; height: 1px!important; width: 1px!important; border: 0!important; position: absolute!important; z-index: -1!important;" src="https://syndication.cosmosmagazine.com/?id=184577&amp;title=Elon+Musk+vs+Russia" width="1" height="1" data-spai-target="src" data-spai-orig="" data-spai-exclude="nocdn" /></p> <div id="contributors"> <p><em><a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/space/elon-musk-starlink-attack-russia/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">This article</a> was originally published on <a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Cosmos Magazine</a> and was written by <a href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/contributor/jamie-seidel" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jamie Seidel</a>. Jamie Seidel is a freelance journalist based in Adelaide.</em></p> <p><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p> </div>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

‘You can’t stop it’: in rural Australia, digital coercive control can be inescapable

<p>Domestic and family violence perpetrators commonly use technology such as phones and other devices as a weapon to control and entrap victims and survivors, alongside other forms of abuse. This “<a href="https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article/59/3/530/5172990?login=true" target="_blank" rel="noopener">digital coercive control</a>” is not bound to a particular location and can follow targets anywhere, any time they access devices or digital media.</p><p>For women outside urban Australia, technology-enabled abuse can pose more risk than for those in cities. In research funded by the <a href="https://www.aic.gov.au" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Australian Institute of Criminology</a>, we spoke to <a href="https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78405" target="_blank" rel="noopener">13 such women who have been subjected to digital coercive control</a> to understand what it is like.</p><p><strong>The disturbing side of technology</strong></p><blockquote><p>… you see a side of a phone that you probably wish you didn’t know about [Shelly]</p></blockquote><p>The women reported that abusers used technology to harass and stalk. The majority experienced image-based sexual abuse (the creation and/or release of intimate images without consent) or recordings made of victims or survivors, overtly or covertly.</p><p>Some experienced doxxing (release of personal and identifiable information). Perpetrators in some cases impersonated real or fake people and initiated contact with women or their children. Authorised functions of phones and other devices and accounts were sometimes impaired, or unauthorised functions enabled.</p><blockquote><p>I think you can feel a lot safer knowing they are not in proximity; they can’t hurt me. When it comes to technology it can – I guess you’re more hyper-vigilant because they can come any time and you can’t stop it. Even if you block someone, they find another way. They do; he always found other means to make contact with me. I never – I guess you never got to escape, which I hadn’t experienced before, because every other type of abuse I was able to – it ended at some point. [Kira]</p></blockquote><p><strong>It is different outside the cities</strong></p><p>These behaviours have also been observed in <a href="https://accan.org.au/Domestic%20Violence%20and%20Communication%20Technology%20final%20report%2020190801.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">urban settings in Australia</a>. Also, like in cities, we found that violence persisted (and often increased) after separation.</p><p>However, women outside cities face higher barriers when seeking help and responding to family violence, and they can also be at greater risk.</p><p>Domestic violence agencies are further from women’s homes in non-urban areas, as we have observed in this study and in <a href="https://eprints.qut.edu.au/104420/13/Landscapes%2Bof%2BViolence%2BCW%2Bedit%2BFINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">other work</a>. Legal services can be limited and there are shortages in alternative and crisis accommodation.</p><p>Complicated financial arrangements and pressures may hinder women’s ability to exit violent relationships, such as where they work on farms or other small businesses and there may be few employment and educational opportunities in the region.</p><p><strong>No anonymity</strong></p><p>Numerous survivors spoke of the lack of anonymity in rural areas, so they and/or their abusers were more likely to be known when disclosing and reporting violence. This can be confronting, especially when perpetrators are well-known and well liked.</p><blockquote><p>He is established - he knows people and he’s well liked … he’s in a boys’ club and knows lots of people … whereas I don’t. [Fiona]</p></blockquote><p>This could be heightened for women with family and networks out of the region or overseas, culturally and linguistically diverse women, criminalised women, or those viewed as “different” outsiders.</p><p>As well as actively destroying women’s social networks, abusers would challenge women’s accounts of abuse and attempt to gather allies, as Claire explains:</p><blockquote><p>He went around the streets telling people that I’m crazy … Because we’re in a small country town he was going in and out of shops … He affiliated himself with one of the local churches and got them on his side.</p></blockquote><p><strong>Isolation and fear</strong></p><p>Abusers socially isolate women, and those in non-urban areas are often socially further from family, friends and support services than those urban areas. We found too, that some abusers sought to extend geographic isolation, by moving women to more remote locations.</p><p>Technology could provide channels to communicate with others and to seek assistance and support. Natalie had “a good amount of friends” and so would be “on the phone, or I’d be texting, and that was my outlet for a crazy situation”. However, some women felt this was not always possible when devices had been taken over or were monitored by abusers.</p><blockquote><p>[I was] too scared to use it [technology]. I just couldn’t reach out to people … I didn’t want to use it just in case [Lola]</p></blockquote><p>Fear loomed large in women’s accounts of digital coercive control. All those we spoke to had contact with police.</p><p>Some had positive encounters, most commonly with specialist (domestic and family violence liaison officers, who are less available in many rural areas) but more spoke of negative encounters. Women who were dissatisfied with police felt that officers were dismissive of digital coercive control.</p><p><strong>‘Homicide flags’</strong></p><p>We believe digital coercive control warrants attention. Coercive control, obsessive tendencies, stalking, and threats to kill or self-harm have all been noted as signals of fatal violence by <a href="https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/586182/domestic-and-family-violence-death-review-and-advisory-board-annual-report-2017-18.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">death review teams</a>.</p><p>The women we interviewed reported all these behaviours. Non-fatal strangulation is another “homicide flag” and was reported by 46% of our participants.</p><p>Firearm ownership and threats to use firearms also signal high risk. Firearm ownership is common on farms and in many rural areas.</p><p>An assault can become a homicide in rural areas, because of the sheer distance between the site of an attack and a hospital or medic.</p><p>It is imperative that we acknowledge and address how technology is used against survivors and the impact that technology-facilitated abuse has on women across landscapes. We must also recognise that women in rural locations face elevated risks, and that digital coercive control can provide evidence and signal risk of fatal violence.</p><hr /><p><em>Pseudonyms have been used for the women quoted in this article.</em></p><p><em>The National Sexual Assault, Family &amp; Domestic Violence Counselling Line – <a href="https://www.1800respect.org.au" target="_blank" rel="noopener">1800 RESPECT</a> (1800 737 732) – is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week for any Australian who has experienced, or is at risk of, family and domestic violence and/or sexual assault.</em><!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img style="border: none !important;margin: 0 !important;max-height: 1px !important;max-width: 1px !important;min-height: 1px !important;min-width: 1px !important;padding: 0 !important" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/176980/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></p><p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/bridget-harris-547362" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bridget Harris</a>, Associate professor, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/queensland-university-of-technology-847" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Queensland University of Technology</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/delanie-woodlock-1287646" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Delanie Woodlock</a>, , <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/unsw-sydney-1414" target="_blank" rel="noopener">UNSW Sydney</a></em></p><p><em>This article is republished from <a href="https://theconversation.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/you-cant-stop-it-in-rural-australia-digital-coercive-control-can-be-inescapable-176980" target="_blank" rel="noopener">original article</a>.</em></p><p><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

8 sneaky female heart attack symptoms women might be ignoring

<p><strong>Women aren't men</strong></p><p>There’s a big disconnect between what women think a heart attack would feel like – excruciating chest pain – and what it often does feel like. “Other than the reproductive system, the cardiovascular system has the most differences between genders,” says Professor Jean McSweeney, PhD, RN. So it’s to be expected that female heart attack symptoms – while sometimes shared with men in a general sense – can also be experienced differently. After all, “we have much smaller vessels in our heart,” says Dr McSweeney, who was among the first to zero in on women’s heart attack symptoms in a 2003 study, published in the journal <em>Circulation</em>. “And we’re constructed differently.”</p><p>When a woman’s main arteries are blocked, she’ll often experience a constellation of signs, including chest pain, pressure or tightness, along with multiple non-chest symptoms, says Judith Hilevi Lichtman, PhD, department chair and associate professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health. What’s more, not every woman experiences the same symptoms, and the symptoms don’t necessarily happen all at once. We spoke with experts and female heart-attack survivors about what some of those symptoms might be and what they feel like. Here are eight that surprised us most.</p><p><strong>A strange-feeling arm</strong></p><p>“I felt like my arm was asleep,” says Tara Robinson, a school counsellor, who, incredibly, survived three heart attacks in one week at the age of 40. For the first two, the feeling would emerge for a couple of minutes and then go away. By the time she arrived at the hospital, the symptoms were gone and she was sent back home without treatment. “I thought maybe I was working out too hard at the gym or I slept on my arm wrong,” she says. By the time the third heart attack struck, that feeling was much more intense and persistent – and impossible to ignore.</p><p>Another heart attack survivor, Lilly Rocha, described her arm as feeling “sore.” In fact, she felt general soreness in her entire upper left side, along with her jaw and chest. At the time, she was 37 and a corporate vice president who organised international events; she’d jet-set from country to country on a regular basis – so she attributed the soreness to the stress of travel. It wasn’t until a co-worker (who had himself experienced a heart attack) insisted on taking her to a hospital did she realise the shocking truth: She’d just had a heart attack.</p><p><strong>A really sore jaw</strong></p><p>Along with arm issues, fatigue and shortness of breath, jaw problems often emerge months before an attack and then intensify during the actual event. Robinson described it as “like the way your mouth feels after you’ve come home from the dentist and the Novocaine hasn’t quite worn off.” As with the arm, the jaw also acts up because of what doctors call “referred” pain, explains Suzanne Steinbaum, DO, attending cardiologist and the director of Women’s Cardiovascular Prevention, Health, and Wellness at The Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City and author of Suzanne Steinbaum’s Heart Book: <em>Every Woman’s Guide to a Heart-Healthy Life</em>. “That pain comes from the heart,” she says. Dr McSweeney recalls a patient who first complained about her jaw to her dentist and was given treatment for TMJ. When that didn’t help, her wisdom tooth was removed. Of course, the pain only got worse – until she ended up in the hospital with a heart attack and was finally properly treated.</p><p><strong>Nausea and vomiting</strong></p><p>In a 2018 <em>Circulation </em>study that examined women and men who experienced a heart attack before age 55, two-thirds of women said they’d experienced epigastric (upper-abdominal) issues, such as indigestion, nausea, or stomach pain, notes Dr Lichtman, the article’s lead author. Only half the men reported similar problems. As Robinson describes that day she was rushed to the hospital with her third heart attack: “I wanted to vomit so badly.” After treatment, she adopted lifestyle changes that included eating a heart-healthy diet. She now helps lead other patients in living healthier.</p><p><strong>Shortness of breath</strong></p><p>This can catch you by surprise while you’re in the middle of running a meeting at work, doing household chores, or even lying down. An early symptom of a heart condition can be the need to prop yourself up in bed in order to breathe better. “You feel out of breath because when your arteries are blocked, there is not enough oxygen being delivered throughout the body,” explains Dr Steinbaum. “If the heart has been damaged or a heart attack is happening, the heart may not have the ability to push the blood forward and this can cause fluid to back up into the lungs.”</p><p><strong>Extreme fatigue</strong></p><p>“Women tend to dismiss heart attack symptoms because we are used to feeling uncomfortable on a monthly basis,” says Dr Steinbaum. “The key to knowing when to get checked is to assess whether the things you do every day and are normal for you suddenly become difficult or you get symptoms while trying to do them.” Robinson remembers having to crawl back to her bedroom after cleaning her shower; she felt weak and wanted to take a nap.</p><p>Dr McSweeney tells of one patient who reported being so tired that she could only make one side of the bed. She needed to rest before making the other. “It’s not this pronounced in every woman,” says Dr McSweeney. But if the fatigue gets progressively worse, or you don’t feel better after you’ve slept, you should see your doctor.</p><p>When Rocha was hit with episodes of extreme fatigue, she blamed it on her hectic travel schedule. By the time she arrived at the hospital, where she waited a long time to be seen – no one suspected she was having a heart attack – the fatigue and feelings on the left side of her body became so overwhelming that she couldn’t move or talk. “I felt like I was going to pass out,” she says. Fortunately, she received treatment before it was too late. She now owns her own company in order to have control over her work-life balance.</p><p><strong>Upper-back pain</strong></p><p>Robinson reports that her back problem was the only symptom she’d describe as actually painful. “It felt as if it was behind my heart,” she says. Other women have described it as a sharp pain between the shoulder blades, which intensified at the time of the heart attack.</p><p><strong>An odd feeling in the chest</strong></p><p>Women don’t necessarily describe it as “chest pain” – much less a “Call an ambulance!” kind of pain. “They may call it ‘chest tightness’ or ‘chest pressure,’” says Dr Lichtman, who adds that women may not associate their symptoms with a heart attack because they’re experiencing other symptoms unrelated to the chest, like fatigue or muscle pain. Rocha felt a “strong tingling sensation – almost like electricity was shooting out of my chest.” It would come and go, she recalls, and in the beginning would last two or three minutes at a time. About six months before her heart attack, she went to her primary care physician (who was also her ob-gyn) because she was convinced she had breast cancer. The doctor did a breast exam, found nothing, and sent her home. Rocha eventually noticed that her entire left side – chest, jaw, and arm – just felt “weird.”</p><p><strong>Flu-like symptoms</strong></p><p>“Women might say, ‘I’m so tired. I must have a virus,’” says Dr Steinbaum. They might convince themselves that all they have are flu symptoms, many of which resemble the conditions above, including body aches, fatigue and nausea. But if the sensations seem different or more intense than anything you’ve felt before, get it checked out. While they may turn out not to be symptoms of a heart condition or precursors to a heart attack, you’re better off not ruling out the possibility – even if you’re under 55 and especially if you have a family history of early-onset heart disease. If you have even the slightest thought that you might be having a heart attack, call an ambulance.</p><p><strong>Wear Red Day is Feb 14, Valentine’s Day, but <a href="https://www.heartresearch.com.au/redfeb/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Heart Research Australia</a> is raising awareness for the whole month of February (aka RedFeb). Getting involved is as simple as wearing red and donating. #wearredanddonate</strong></p><p><em><span id="docs-internal-guid-b17a06eb-7fff-dd09-11c8-ce867b3d8400">Written by Joanne Chen. This article first appeared in <a href="https://www.readersdigest.co.nz/healthsmart/conditions/heart-blood-pressure/8-sneaky-female-heart-attack-symptoms-women-might-be-ignoring" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Reader’s Digest</a>. For more of what you love from the world’s best-loved magazine, <a href="http://readersdigest.innovations.co.nz/c/readersdigestemailsubscribe?utm_source=over60&amp;utm_medium=articles&amp;utm_campaign=RDSUB&amp;keycode=WRA87V" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here’s our best subscription offer.</a></span></em></p><p><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p>

Body

Placeholder Content Image

Does it really empower women to expect them to make the first move?

<p>Heterosexual dating conventions have long held that men make the first move: first to flirt, first to ask out on a date, first to propose.</p> <p>What if the roles were reversed?</p> <p>That’s what one dating app, Bumble, has tried to do.</p> <p>Bumble brands itself as a <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/08/bumble-app-whitney-wolfe" target="_blank">feminist dating app</a> that’s designed to empower women. According to <a rel="noopener" href="https://bumble.com/" target="_blank">Bumble’s website</a>, the app was developed to “challenge the antiquated rules of dating” by requiring those who identify as women to initiate communication with men they match with.</p> <p>With over 100 million users as of 2020, <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.businessofapps.com/data/bumble-statistics/" target="_blank">Bumble is one of the most popular dating apps</a> on the market, and <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5FmVpQ4iO4" target="_blank">in interviews I conducted with over 100 people about online dating</a> in my <a rel="noopener" href="https://connectingdigitally.com/" target="_blank">“Connecting Digitally” study</a>, more than half reported using Bumble.</p> <p>But my research shows that Bumble, despite purporting to empower women, leaves many female users feeling frustrated and vulnerable. This disconnect can be linked in part to the ways in which many men engage with online dating apps.</p> <p><strong>When a match is meaningless</strong></p> <p>Bumble’s attempts at “<a rel="noopener" href="https://bumble.com/" target="_blank">levelling the playing field and changing the dynamics of dating</a>” and empowering users to “<a rel="noopener" href="https://bumble.com/" target="_blank">connect with confidence</a>” makes sense in theory, but not in practice.</p> <p><a rel="noopener" href="https://youtu.be/H5FmVpQ4iO4" target="_blank">Women in my study reported</a> a number of counterproductive user practices based on their own swiping experiences and conversations with male Bumble users.</p> <p>A 39-year-old female participant in my study described the frustration of making the first move and not getting any response: “So then all of a sudden you’re a match, but they would never say anything or respond to you … you wouldn’t hear from them. What’s the point? Why even bother?”</p> <p>Rather than evaluating profiles carefully and swiping “yes” on women they’re serious about, men are often <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/670200" target="_blank">likely to swipe right based only on the profile photo</a>.</p> <p>In addition, many men approach online dating as a numbers game and practice what some call “<a rel="noopener" href="https://twitter.com/bumble/status/1139706620416425989?lang=en" target="_blank">power swiping</a>” or “<a rel="noopener" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0265407517706419" target="_blank">shotgun swiping</a>” by saying “yes” to everyone and seeing who shows interest and matches with them. Many of them will only read a women’s profile information after matching.</p> <p>Lastly, because some men are <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3710505/What-Tinder-strategy-Men-likely-casually-swipe-right-women-match-attract-them.html" target="_blank">just swiping for the ego boost</a> of “likes,” they’ll simply delete the match rather than respond to a women’s invitation to chat.</p> <p>Women in my study often pointed out that a match was far from a guarantee of mutual interest. Unfortunately, due to “<a rel="noopener" href="https://lithub.com/swipe-right-for-loneliness-on-the-gamification-of-dating-apps/" target="_blank">the gamification of dating</a>” – the way the apps are designed to be engaging and addictive – mindless swiping is a common phenomena across all dating apps, not just Bumble.</p> <p><strong>Communication and power</strong></p> <p>For decades, language scholars have been researching how people connect – or fail to connect – <a rel="noopener" href="https://doi.org/10.2307/412243" target="_blank">in conversation</a>.</p> <p>We say that the person speaking “holds the floor,” and they can wield power through choosing the topic, talking for longer periods of time and steering the conversation in certain directions.</p> <p>However, not all power is maintained through holding the floor. Not taking up a speaker’s topic in conversation, either by changing the topic or ignoring the question altogether, is another way to exercise power.</p> <p>In other words, in any conversation, it takes two to tango. <a rel="noopener" href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00312.x" target="_blank">As the authors of a study on email communication and response times put it</a>, “failure to respond or to take the floor creates a breakdown.” On dating apps, not responding to an opening message is akin to ignoring someone who’s asking you a question in a face-to-face conversation.</p> <p><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/442142/original/file-20220124-21-1f3lrvj.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="A video billboard reads 'Woman. Fighter. Wife. Patriot. Feminist. Mother. Hero. Justice.'" /> <em><span class="caption">Bumble, which has made empowering women a key facet of its brand, pays tribute to former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in an advertisement.</span> <span class="attribution"><a rel="noopener" href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/07.RBG.Bumble.UnionStation.WDC.23September2020_%2850381239022%29.jpg" target="_blank" class="source">Wikimedia Commons</a>, <a rel="noopener" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" target="_blank" class="license">CC BY-SA</a></span></em></p> <p>On Bumble, women may be given the control to take the floor first and direct the initial topic of conversation through, as Bumble terms it, “<a rel="noopener" href="https://bumble.com/en/help/how-does-messaging-work-on-bumble#:%7E:text=Users%20who%20have%20First%20Move,First%20Moves%20are%20time%2Dsensitive!" target="_blank">first move privileges</a>.” However, when men fail to respond or unmatch after receiving that opening message, the women in my study reported feeling dismissed, rejected and, ultimately, disempowered.</p> <p>In 2020, <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-01-17/for-bumble-the-future-isn-t-female-it-s-female-marketing" target="_blank">Bloomberg published an article</a> exploring Bumble’s marketing tactics and brand messaging. Though the company maintains that requiring women to message first “reduces harassment” and “creates a kinder exchange between two people,” the author of the article noted that Bumble was never able to provide tangible proof of “how Bumble was keeping women safer or leading to more equitable relationships.”</p> <p><strong>Switching poles doesn’t solve the problem</strong></p> <p>On a positive note, Bumble has become a catalyst for conversation about gender, power and communication in online dating. And while <a rel="noopener" href="https://theconversation.com/love-lust-and-digital-dating-men-on-the-bumble-dating-app-arent-ready-for-the-queen-bee-120796" target="_blank">many may not be ready for women to make the first move</a>, most of the male and female Bumble users in my study <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5FmVpQ4iO" target="_blank">noted that they chose the app</a> precisely because of its philosophy of empowering women. To me, this speaks to the fact that people are ready to embrace Bumble’s goals of “<a rel="noopener" href="https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/408946-female-driven-dating-app-bumble-publishes-full-page-ad-in-the" target="_blank">shaking up outdated gender norms</a>.”</p> <p>That hasn’t stopped some men and women from decrying Bumble’s unique design as sexist. In fact, <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.bumblemessagingsettlement.com/" target="_blank">a class action lawsuit filed in 2018 accused Bumble of discriminating</a> against heterosexual male app users because the app only allows women to send messages first. Bumble denied wrongdoing, but agreed to settle in 2021 to avoid further costly litigation.</p> <p>A 37-year-old female participant in my study thought the app’s emphasis on gender was artificial and constrictive: “I don’t like it when people limit things by sex or gender. That doesn’t feel empowering to me. It just feels like they’re trying to [enact] reverse sexism.”</p> <p>By creating a situation where the right to speak and direct conversation is only given to members identifying with one gender, the work of coming up with unique and engaging opening messages falls on that group.</p> <p>Men have traditionally done more of this work. Many of them don’t exactly cherish initiating conversations with countless strangers, <a rel="noopener" href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23538-3_22" target="_blank">a process that’s rife with anxiety and rejection</a>.</p> <p>For heterosexual matches on Bumble, women are now required to do the part. Yet to place the work of initiating conversation solely on one group seems to encourage passivity in the other party, which seems to only hamper healthy communication.<!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></p> <p><em><a rel="noopener" href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/riki-thompson-964482" target="_blank">Riki Thompson</a>, Associate Professor of Digital Rhetoric and Writing Studies, <a rel="noopener" href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-washington-699" target="_blank">University of Washington</a></em></p> <p><em>This article is republished from <a rel="noopener" href="https://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a rel="noopener" href="https://theconversation.com/does-it-really-empower-women-to-expect-them-to-make-the-first-move-175032" target="_blank">original article</a>.</em></p> <p><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p>

Relationships

Placeholder Content Image

When is it better to restart vs. shut down your computer?

<p><strong>Keep calm and shut down</strong></p> <p><span>There are some who believe there’s nothing that can’t be fixed on your computer by shutting it down and starting over. </span></p> <p><span>That may be a stretch, but truly, the shutdown option has always been seen as a cure-all for technical difficulties. </span></p> <p><span>Is it really that simple, though? And can a restart create the same system magic?</span></p> <p><strong>The case for shutting down</strong></p> <p><span>Anh Trinh is the managing editor at Geek with Laptop, a site that helps readers gain knowledge around all kinds of tech subjects. </span></p> <p><span>She explains that shutting down a computer is a way to power down all processes of the machine. </span></p> <p><span>“It’s very similar to a restart but with the exception that your computer won’t turn back on again until someone powers it up,” she explains. </span></p> <p><span>“This is especially useful if you plan to leave your computer for a while.”</span></p> <p><strong>Shut down isn't what it used to be</strong></p> <p>People with newer computers may experience a different kind of shutdown these days, according to ProPrivacy digital privacy expert Ray Walsh.</p> <p>“Although many people assume that a shutdown is a more comprehensive way to ensure that all processes are killed, the reality is that since Windows 8, this is a fallacy,” he says.</p> <p>“In older versions of Windows, both ‘shut down’ and ‘restart’ did exactly the same thing in terms of shutting down processes. However, since Windows 8, a new feature called Fast Startup has altered this considerably.”</p> <p>How has that changed things, exactly? “Shutting down a Windows computer actually creates a deep hibernation file that the PC later leverages to allow for Fast Startup. A restart, on the other hand, completely kills all processes, clears the RAM, and clears the processor cache,” he explains.</p> <p>“This is why a restart is the preferred method when completing a new install or uninstall and why a computer restarts during Windows Operating System updates.”</p> <p>And just so we’re clear, forcible shutdowns are a different story entirely.</p> <p><strong>What about Macs?</strong></p> <p><span>“A Mac is a Unix environment in which everything is cleared during both ‘shut down’ and ‘restart,’” Walsh explains. </span></p> <p><span>“This makes both ‘shut down’ and ‘restart’ identical in that all processes, cache and memory will be cleared, giving the machine a complete refresh.” </span></p> <p><span>In other words, there’s no real difference between a shut down or a restart for Mac users. This means most of the information that follows applies to PC users only unless otherwise stated.</span></p> <p><strong>Which situations call for a restart vs. a shutdown?</strong></p> <p>“When you’re installing new software or hardware, you’re going to need to restart your computer. This will shut off all processes so that the Kernal can be reestablished with the new software or hardware in consideration,” says Shayne Sherman, CEO of TechLoris.</p> <p>For those who aren’t aware, the Kernal is a part of the operating system that manages memory and CPU time.</p> <p>“This is also what you want to use when you’re having problems with your computer, since this will kill all processes and restart them.”</p> <p>And yes, this is different for Macs, according to Walsh. “Due to the fact that a Mac always clears everything during a reboot, Mac users will always clear their machine when they restart or shut down,” he adds.</p> <p><strong>How often should users be performing a restart?</strong></p> <p><span>“Most IT experts recommend doing a restart at least once every two to three days to permit Windows to clean up open files, get rid of temp files, and update itself,” Walsh says. </span></p> <p><span>“This ensures that deleted files and other assets are removed from a PC’s cache and aren’t left hanging around, potentially causing security or privacy issues.”</span></p> <p><strong>How often should users be performing a system shutdown?</strong></p> <p><span>“Shutting down a computer is a more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly way to leave a PC unattended,” Walsh explains. </span></p> <p><span>“Leaving a PC in sleep mode results in some power usage by the RAM and from the storage of open files and programs.”</span></p> <p><strong>Which option is better for battery life?</strong></p> <p><span>“A shut down is a deep hibernation that ensures that your computer is not wasting energy,” Walsh says.</span></p> <p><span> “A restart only momentarily turns the machine off to stop all processes, clear the RAM, and clear the processor cache. Thus, a shut down is better for power consumption and better for prolonging the life of the battery.”</span></p> <p><strong>Which option is better for security?</strong></p> <p><span>This is one area where the answer is the same for both PCs and Macs. “Shutting down a Windows PC or Mac is considered better for security because it means that the machine is completely offline for the period of time that it is off,” Walsh says. </span></p> <p><span>“This removes the potential for that machine to be hacked and stops it from communicating with a command and control server if it has already been infected with an exploit.”</span></p> <p><strong>What about cold temperatures?</strong></p> <p>Believe it or not, temperature should be one of your considerations when deciding whether to shut down or restart.</p> <p>“The cold can be extremely damaging to batteries, which is why it is unwise to switch off a battery-operated device when it is extremely cold,” Walsh explains.</p> <p>“It is better to keep a laptop running rather than switch it off in a cold car.”</p> <p>But that’s not the only reason to avoid a shut down in cold temperatures. “In extremely cold temperatures, it can potentially be unwise to turn off a computer abruptly, particularly if you have been performing intensive CPU/GPU tasks that have made the computer heat up considerably,” Walsh says.</p> <p>“This is because going from hot to cold quickly may adversely affect the PC’s microelectronic components due to thermal contraction.”</p> <p>If you have no choice but to shut down, Walsh advises waiting a little while after the intense processes have ended; that will allow the internal components to slowly cool down first.</p> <p>“However, generally speaking, computers like the cold and will perform better in the cold, where they will not heat up as much performing intensive processes,” he adds.</p> <p><strong>How about hot temperatures?</strong></p> <p><span>“The biggest danger for computers is extreme heat,” Walsh says. </span></p> <p><span>“Anytime that a computer is exposed to extremely hot conditions, it is best to power it down and leave it switched off. Even a relatively hot office can potentially be highly damaging to a computer’s components if the computer is overheating. This will substantially reduce the life span of the computer and is much more of a concern than the cold.”</span></p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p> <p><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.readersdigest.co.nz/true-stories-lifestyle/science-technology/when-is-it-better-to-restart-vs-shut-down-your-computer?pages=1">Reader's Digest</a>. </em></p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Men are just more competitive? Science says it’s not that simple

<p>When trying to understand America’s persistent gender wage gap, researchers have in the past decade suggested that women are less competitive than men, and are therefore passed over for higher-ranking roles.</p> <p>But a new study from the University of Arizona shows it’s probably not that simple; in fact, women are just as likely to enter into a competition as men – but only when there’s the option to share their winnings with the losers.</p> <p>The <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111943118" target="_blank">study</a>, published today in <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,</em> was led by Mary Rigdon from the University of Arizona’s Center for the Philosophy of Freedom, in cooperation with Alessandra Cassar, a professor of economics at the University of San Francisco.</p> <p><strong>Gender wage gap persists</strong></p> <p>In 2021, women will earn 82 cents for every dollar earned by men, says Rigdon. This means women work nearly three months more to receive the same amount of pay as men. When these results are adjusted to cover age, experience, and level of education, women still earn about 98 cents on the male dollar – in other words, an equally qualified woman is paid 2% less than her male counterparts.</p> <p>Economists have considered a few possible explanations for this, Rigdon says. One theory, known as the “human capital explanation”, suggests that there are gender differences in certain skills, leading women to careers that pay less. Another theory – perhaps the most widely considered – is patent discrimination.</p> <p>The researchers decided to test the other prevailing theory – the competitiveness theory – because they reasoned that if women were so reluctant to compete, they would occupy fewer high-ranking positions at the top of major companies, a trend that is not represented in the growing presence of women in leadership roles.</p> <p>“We thought it must be the case that women are as competitive as men, but they just exhibit it differently, so we wanted to try to get at that story and demonstrate that that is the case,” Rigdon says. “Because that’s then a very different story about the gender wage gap.”</p> <p><strong>Testing a troublesome theory</strong></p> <p>Rigdon and Cassar randomly assigned 238 participants – split nearly evenly by gender – to two different groups for the study. Participants in each of the two groups were then assigned to four-person subgroups.</p> <p>For all participants, the first round of the study was the same: each was asked to look at tables of 12 three-digit numbers with two decimal places and find the two numbers that add to 10. Participants were asked to solve as many tables as possible – up to 20 – in two minutes. Each participant was paid $2 for every table they solved in the first round.</p> <p>In round two, participants were asked to do the same task, but the two groups were incentivized differently. In the first group, the two participants in each four-person team who solved the most tables earned $4 per table solved, while their other two team members were given nothing. In the other group, the top two performers of each four-person team also earned $4 per table, but they had the right to decide how much of the prize money to share with one of the lower performing participants.</p> <p>In the third round, all participants were allowed to choose which payment scheme they preferred from the two previous rounds. For half the study participants, this meant a choice between a guaranteed $2 per correct table, or potentially $4 per correct table if they became one of the top two performers in their four-person subgroup. For the other half of the participants, the choice was $2 per correct table, or $4 per correct table for the top-two performers with the option to share the winnings with one of the losing participants.</p> <p>The number of women who chose the competitive option nearly doubled when given the option to share their winnings; about 60% chose to compete under that option, while only about 35% chose to compete in the winner-take-all version of the tournament.</p> <p>About 51% of men in the study chose the winner-take-all option, and 52.5% chose the format that allowed for sharing with the losers.</p> <p>While the sample size is relatively small, the results deserve attention.</p> <p>Rigdon and Cassar have a few theories about why women might be more inclined to compete when the winnings are shared. One suggests that female participants are interested in controlling the way winnings are divvied up; another, popular among evolutionary psychologists, is that female participants may be inclined to smooth over bad feelings in a group setting. Yet the answer may lie less in biology and more in socialisation, perhaps that women are encouraged from a young age to be “nice=”: at this point, the jury’s still out.</p> <p>“We really have to ask what it is about this social incentive that drives women to compete,” Rigdon says. “We think it’s recognising the different costs and benefits that come from your different biological and cultural constraints. But at the end of the day, I think we still have this question.”</p> <p>Rigdon and Cassar are now designing a study to drive to the heart of that question.</p> <p>“If we’re finally going to close the gender pay gap, then we have to understand the sources of it – and also solutions and remedies for it,” Rigdon says.</p> <!-- Start of tracking content syndication. Please do not remove this section as it allows us to keep track of republished articles --> <p><img id="cosmos-post-tracker" style="opacity: 0; height: 1px!important; width: 1px!important; border: 0!important; position: absolute!important; z-index: -1!important;" src="https://syndication.cosmosmagazine.com/?id=171365&amp;title=Men+are+just+more+competitive%3F+Science+says+it%E2%80%99s+not+that+simple" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p> <!-- End of tracking content syndication --> <div id="contributors"> <p><em><a rel="noopener" href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/behaviour/are-men-more-competitive-than-women/" target="_blank">This article</a> was originally published on <a rel="noopener" href="https://cosmosmagazine.com" target="_blank">Cosmos Magazine</a> and was written by <a rel="noopener" href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/contributor/amalyah-hart" target="_blank">Amalyah Hart</a>. Amalyah Hart is a science journalist based in Melbourne.</em></p> <p><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p> </div>

Relationships

Placeholder Content Image

Women disadvantaged when it comes to cardiac care

<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">Women with some cardiac conditions receive less evidence-based treatment than their male counterparts, research </span><a style="font-size: 14px;" rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2021/216/3/sex-differences-management-and-outcomes-non-st-elevation-acute-coronary" target="_blank">published</a><span style="font-size: 14px;"> today by the </span><em style="font-size: 14px;">Medical Journal of Australia</em><span style="font-size: 14px;"> has confirmed.</span></p> <div class="copy"> <p>Researchers from the University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital and Concord Repatriation General Hospital analysed registry data for patients diagnosed with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) – which includes myocardial infarction and unstable angina – in 43 Australian hospitals from 23 February 2009 to 16 October 2018.</p> <p>The authors found important differences in baseline characteristics by sex. Concerningly, this included fewer treatment plans offered to women than men.</p> <p>Professor Roxana Mehran, Director of the Center for Interventional Cardiovascular Research and Clinical Trials at the Cardiovascular Research Institute at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, described these findings to <em>MJA InSight</em>+ as “a huge, huge issue for women”.</p> <p>In an <em>MJA InSight</em>+ exclusive podcast, Mehran said that women’s undertreatment in this area was mostly a result of a lack of data and female participation in clinical trials.</p> <p>“The disparities continue to remain there, despite all of our education,” she said.</p> <p>“We’re seeing that the prevalence of acute myocardial infarction is actually increasing instead of decreasing, especially among women over the age of 45. We are seeing that recurrent myocardial infarction and recurrent events are higher for women compared with men.</p> <p>“We’re seeing increasing myocardial infarction in young women, or admissions for younger women presenting with an acute coronary syndrome, and we know that women present differently, they have different triggers, their lesion and their vessels look very different than men.”</p> <p>In an <em>MJA</em> editorial, Mehran and her co-authors wrote that: “Even in patients with documented coronary artery disease, secondary prevention therapies were less frequently prescribed for women than for men. Further, women were less likely to be referred for cardiac rehabilitation.”</p> <p>The researchers’ findings, wrote Mehran and her co-authors, “add to the body of evidence that differences in treatment constitute a problem that is not adequately managed even in high income countries.</p> <p>“The authors have provided further evidence for sex‐based disparities in the management and treatment of people with NSTE‐ACS. Their findings indicate the importance of the further investigation of sex‐specific pathophysiological mechanisms and the urgent need for evidence‐based sex‐specific strategies and recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ischaemic heart disease.</p> <p>“Women with NSTE‐ACS are both understudied and undertreated, and the report … is a valuable contribution to increasing global awareness of differences between men and women in the characteristics of heart disease, and to promoting cardiovascular health in women.”</p> <p>A total of 7783 patients were eligible for analysis, including 2422 women (31%).</p> <p>Patients’ outcomes, both in-hospital and at six-month follow-up, were assessed. The researchers also separately assessed these differences in patients with documented coronary artery disease.</p> <!-- Start of tracking content syndication. Please do not remove this section as it allows us to keep track of republished articles --> <img id="cosmos-post-tracker" style="opacity: 0; height: 1px!important; width: 1px!important; border: 0!important; position: absolute!important; z-index: -1!important;" src="https://syndication.cosmosmagazine.com/?id=166238&amp;title=Women+disadvantaged+when+it+comes+to+cardiac+care" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> <!-- End of tracking content syndication --></div> <div id="contributors"> <p><a rel="noopener" href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/health/women-disadvantaged-when-it-comes-to-cardiac-care/" target="_blank">This article</a> was originally published on <em><a rel="noopener" href="https://cosmosmagazine.com" target="_blank">Cosmos Magazine</a></em> and was written by <a rel="noopener" href="https://cosmosmagazine.com/contributor/ian-connellan" target="_blank">Ian Connellan</a>. Ian Connellan is editor-in-chief of the Royal Institution of Australia.</p> </div>

Body

Placeholder Content Image

“Instagram Vs Reality”: New photo of Prince Louis shows he’s just like any other two-year-old

<p>Kensington Palace released two new images on the morning of Prince Louis’ second birthday, proving that despite his royal status, he’s just like any other two-year-old.</p> <p>The photos taken by Duchess Kate showed the youngest Cambridge finger painting with colours of the rainbow, while the second photo shows the toddler smearing it all over his face.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/B_UHBjUl963/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="12"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="margin: 8px 0 0 0; padding: 0 4px;"><a style="color: #000; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B_UHBjUl963/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">🌈 Instagram vs Reality. Thank you for all your lovely messages on Prince Louis’ second birthday! The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are very pleased to share new photographs of Prince Louis, taken by The Duchess this April.</a></p> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;">A post shared by <a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/kensingtonroyal/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank"> Kensington Palace</a> (@kensingtonroyal) on Apr 23, 2020 at 12:00am PDT</p> </div> </blockquote> <p>“Instagram Vs Reality,” they captioned the post, adding: “Thank you for your lovely messages on Prince Louis’s second birthday.”</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/B_TFx2vF-ix/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="12"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="margin: 8px 0 0 0; padding: 0 4px;"><a style="color: #000; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B_TFx2vF-ix/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">Sharing a sneak peek of Prince Louis’ handiwork ahead of his second birthday! 🎨 • The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are pleased to share new images of Prince Louis, taken by The Duchess this April.</a></p> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;">A post shared by <a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/kensingtonroyal/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank"> Kensington Palace</a> (@kensingtonroyal) on Apr 22, 2020 at 2:30pm PDT</p> </div> </blockquote> <p>The photos were taken earlier this month at Anmer Hall, in Norfolk, where the family are staying during the coronavirus outbreak.</p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Greek yoghurt vs ‘regular’ yoghurt: Which one is healthier?

<p>Once a rare option, Greek yoghurt has become as popular as its regular counterpart today. Fans praise Greek yoghurt as not only the tastier of two, but also the healthier alternative. But what does science say about this claim?</p> <p>While both yoghurts are made of the same ingredients – milk and live cultures – Greek yoghurt is strained more extensively to remove most of whey liquid, lactose and sugar, creating a thicker, more concentrated product.</p> <p>Because of this, Greek yoghurt can have up to twice as much protein as the regular version while cutting the sugar and sodium content by half. The removal of whey liquid also means that the sweet aftertaste is taken out, giving the yoghurt a stronger, tangier flavour.</p> <p>“For someone who wants the creamier texture, a little bit of a protein edge and a sugar decrease, going Greek is definitely not all hype,” registered dietitian Dawn Jackson Blatner told <span><a href="https://health.usnews.com/wellness/food/articles/greek-yogurt-vs-regular-yogurt-which-is-more-healthful"><em>US News</em></a></span>.</p> <p>However, Greek yoghurt packs more in the fat department. According to dietitian Carol Aguirre of Nutrition Connections, a serving size of Greek yoghurt can have <span><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com.au/whats-the-big-deal-about-greek-yogurt-2018-11?r=US&amp;IR=T">10 grams of fat with 7 grams of it being saturated fat</a></span>, while regular yoghurt contains 8 grams of fat with 5 grams saturated.</p> <p>Regular yoghurt also has higher levels of calcium, minerals and probiotics thanks to the less strenuous straining process.</p> <p>Both yoghurts can be a great addition to your diet – but the one to put in your shopping cart depends on your dietary and taste preferences.</p>

Body

Placeholder Content Image

Grandparents vs Parents: Who will win in the battle against screens?

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">New concerns surrounding screen time and mobile phone usage is causing rifts between parents and grandparents.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Parents, who want to limit their children’s screen time, can lay down the law, but it can be difficult if the grandparents are giving the children a bit more screen time than they’re allowed.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Both parties don’t want to rock the boat, despite their differing opinions. Grandparents don’t want to miss out on time with the kids and parents don’t want to miss out on work as they scramble to find a replacement babysitter.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, when instructions are repeatedly ignored, this can cause rifts. A mother told </span><a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/its-grandparents-v-parents-in-the-battle-over-kids-screens-11556011800"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Wall Street Journal</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that she limits screen time at home, but when the kids go to grandma’s, the rule is significantly relaxed.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Every time I talk to her about it, she’s like, ‘Well, I never get to see my grandkids, and they need to have fun with me.’ To her, watching a movie together is connecting. To me, that’s not connecting,” the mother explained. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, the grandmother explained that she didn’t see a problem. She told </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">TWSJ</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that she let her granddaughter stay on the iPad until 2 in the morning on a school night playing games.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I told my granddaughter to turn it [the iPad] off. I didn’t want to get busted.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The tension between the pair has frustrated the mother so much, she’s hired a babysitter to take care of her children on the weekends. Despite the tension, she’s reluctant to push the issue too much as she realises how lucky she is to have her mother still around.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I don’t know how much time I have on this earth and I want them to have memories of how fun Mimi was,” Ms. Kapsi Potter said of her grandchildren. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“That’s what’s important to me. If there’s something they want to watch, I’ll let them. I let them stay up late. They can do whatever they want but set the house on fire.”</span></p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Pizza vs cereal: Nutritionist weighs in on the healthier breakfast option

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A US dietician has suggested that eating a slice of pizza for breakfast is a healthier choice than a bowl of breakfast cereal.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Chelsey Amer, US dietician, caused a stir when she said the following, according to the </span><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/dining/sns-dailymeal-1868354-healthy-eating-pizza-healthier-breakfast-cereal-20180126-story.html"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Chicago Tribune</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">:</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“You may be surprised to find out that an average slice of pizza and a bowl of cereal with whole milk contain nearly the same amount of calories,” Amer said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“However, pizza packs a much larger protein punch, which will keep you full and boost satiety throughout the morning.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Many nutritionists were quick to refute her claims. Although many cereals are known for their high sugar content, you don’t have to make that choice for breakfast.</span></p> <p><a href="https://www.health.com/nutrition/pizza-more-nutritious-breakfast-cereal"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Health’s</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> contributing nutrition editor, Cynthia Sass, said that not all breakfast cereals have to be off limits.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">"A cereal made with whole grains, nuts or seeds, and fruit with organic grass-fed milk or plant-based milk is a better choice over a grease-laden pizza made with processed meat like pepperoni on a white flour crust," she says.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Even though pizza sounds like a much more delicious option, you can even have leftovers for breakfast.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">"Even a second helping of dinner set aside from the previous night can make a healthy breakfast if it's chock full of veggies and balanced—for example, a generous portion of veggies sauteed in EVOO with herbs tossed with a lean protein, or chicken breast or lentils with a small scoop of quinoa," Sass suggests. </span></p>

Food & Wine

Placeholder Content Image

Financial security vs financial freedom

<p>On the subject of financial planning, terms such as “financial security” and “financial freedom” often get thrown around loosely. On the surface, they may seem like generalised terms that roughly mean the same thing, but when you dig deeper, there is a dramatic difference between them. While both are important and valid financial goals, understanding that difference could have a profound effect on your financial future.</p> <p><strong class="bigger-text">So what is financial security?</strong><br />Essentially, financial security focuses on conservation. If you are employed and earning an income, for example, financial security is all about ensuring that the standard of living you and your family enjoy is not put under threat.</p> <p>For a start, this might mean ensuring that you are dedicated to your work, and take steps to improve your abilities and skills, so that your prospects for retaining your job or business and earning a greater income are strong. Beyond that, it might mean taking steps to provide a fallback position, such as saving three to six months’ of income in an emergency fund to cater for a sudden medical situation, loss of employment, or family crisis.</p> <p>At a broader level, ensuring financial security should also include a personal insurance plan, which can replace your financial value to your family if you were to suddenly die or become permanently disabled. If you suffer an injury or illness that prevents you from earning income for an extended period, income protection insurance can offer extra security for you and your family.</p> <p>Financial security also has relevance for your long-term saving and retirement planning. You might say that financial security in retirement means being able to independently afford the basic lifestyle requirements of shelter, food, clothing, transport, and other general living expenses.</p> <p>At its core, however, financial security is conservatively focused on maintaining what you already have in the event of a crisis, sickness, or retirement. While certainly a worthy and sensible goal, it doesn’t look beyond those needs, or toward more ambitious targets.</p> <p><strong class="bigger-text">Financial freedom is quite different</strong><br />If you are financially secure, you can certainly get by — but what if you want a bit more out of life than just preserving a basic existence? Financial freedom, in essence, means having the resources to make decisions about what you buy, do, or see without having to worry about impacting your basic living standards in the future. It means having the freedom to fulfil dreams of where you live, how you spend your time, which travel destinations you can experience, and how you can support your family.</p> <p>This kind of freedom is something that very few people are able to achieve, but it is not limited to those who are born into money, inherit money, or win the lottery. Financial freedom can be achieved by an ordinary working person if they have the vision — and employ the methods, planning and habits — to get them there.</p> <p><strong class="bigger-text">It starts with an attitude</strong><br />Financial freedom can be a realistic goal for many of us but it won’t happen by accident. The formula for achieving financial freedom involves several key aspects that need your deliberate action and attention:</p> <ul> <li>The fundamental characteristic of those who build their own financial freedom is an attitude and a belief that they can achieve a lifestyle beyond their current circumstances. This means having the confidence to dream big and visualise those specific things that you want to enjoy in life.<br /><br /></li> <li>Being clear about your dreams, and putting them down in black and white is the next step. Really owning your dreams in this way will give you the motivation and impetus to take action toward them.<br /><br /></li> <li>You then need to break down the financial requirements needed to get you to your goals — your financial plan. This is where the nuts and bolts are worked out on issues such as budgeting, saving, and investing. Without a solid financial plan, financial freedom will only ever be wishful thinking.<br /><br /></li> <li>Finally, you need to engage the help of those who have greater expertise than you. It may be hard for some of us to accept that we can’t do everything on our own, but the fact is that those who have really succeeded in any aspect of life have one common characteristic; they surround themselves with people who know more than they do.</li> </ul> <p>In terms of financial freedom, this means engaging financial professionals, such as an accountant and a financial planner, who’s expertise you can draw on to help you articulate and prioritise your goals, construct a sophisticated financial plan, research the best opportunities for investment, balance the need for capital preservation and capital growth, maximise your taxation and social security entitlements and review and adjust plans to adapt to changing needs and situations.</p> <p>If you are not simply satisfied with having financial security and you want true financial freedom, the potential is there for you, but there are no short cuts. Take action on all the steps outlined here and you can make it happen.<br /><br />What does financial freedom mean to you? Share your thoughts below.</p> <p><em>Republished with permission of <a href="https://www.wyza.com.au/articles/money/financial-planning/financial-security-vs-financial-freedom.aspx"><span>Wyza.com.au</span>.</a></em></p>

Retirement Income

Placeholder Content Image

Freedom camping: Australia vs New Zealand

<p>Freedom campers in New Zealand may think they have it tough, but Tony Allsop reckons the Aussies have it even tougher.</p> <p>Born in Wellington in 1940, Allsop fell for the freedom camping lifestyle when he first moved to Australia at 19 and went on to carve out a career in writing and taking photos for caravan magazines on both sides of the ditch.</p> <p>Now retired and based in Queensland's Mackay, he still freedom camps regularly, but says the days of going walkabout (or driveabout) and expecting to be able to set up camp in a secluded spot in the wilds are long gone.</p> <p>"In New Zealand there are many free camping spots and councils even set up places for free campers. Here now, councils are making it illegal to camp unless you are completely self-sufficient, have holdings tanks for both grey and black water and there's a limit to how long you can stay."</p> <p>Many so-called free camping areas in Australia are now patrolled and have introduced fees "as the rubbish and toilet paper has become intolerable"</p> <p>"Rubbish left at sites is a big problem in Australia, whereas it was not so bad in New Zealand [on a recent trip]. Backpackers are often blamed in Australia and we have had some bad experiences here with them. Once, two of them high on drugs wanted to fight us at 1am."</p> <p>The costs associated with maintaining caravan parks have forced many to close or sell to developers, he said, pointing to the recent example of Discovery Parks buying the Top Parks brand. </p> <p>Allsop is a camper of the old-school variety, having spent his formative years travelling around the East Cape, Napier and other parts of the North Island with his camping-mad dad. He slept in an old army surplus pup tent alongside his parents' larger canvas one until the family upgraded to a comparatively flash plywood caravan with louvre windows when he was 10.  </p> <p>"Compared to these days it was all very primitive. Caravan parks just had toilets and showers - that was about all."</p> <p>On his first working holiday in Australia, he met three fellow Kiwis who were travelling around the country in an old Plymouth and even older Chrysler towing two caravans (old as well of course) and decided to join them. </p> <p>"Two of the guys had girlfriends travelling with them so I had to sleep in the Plymouth or cheap hotels."</p> <p>Despite the dodgy accommodation and poor state of state of the roads in Queensland at the time - most were dirt and some were little more than tracks - he was hooked. </p> <p>After two years back in Wellington, he moved to Brisbane permanently and married his girlfriend Denyse, a doctor who luckily happened to love camping just as much as he did. </p> <p>In 1974, the couple set off in their new two-door Ford Falcon on what was to become the first of several "round-Oz" trips. </p> <p>"We freedom camped a lot, sleeping in the car or beside it in sleeping bags on a deserted beach."</p> <p>They spent a year on the road, covering thousands of miles and picking up work whenever and wherever they needed it. </p> <p>"We met very little traffic and most roads were dirt. It was a real adventure in those days."</p> <p>While the couple now travel in relative luxury in a well-equipped modern caravan, they consider their second round-Oz trip in 1988  - in a 1986 Holden with a small off-road camper - as the greatest camping trip of their lives. </p> <p>"We stayed mainly off-road on this 10-month trip and saw very few people as caravans with all the ensuites, batteries and DC-DC chargers... We camped on wonderful isolated beaches, in national parks and the made the most of our small camper with no real amenities apart from those I put in ... We really felt like explorers as some places had seen no traffic for a long time."</p> <p>But while it might have been basic, their camper was still more or less self sufficient. Allsop had installed a battery under the seat - which they used to power two lights, one inside and one out - they used a black plastic bag left out in the sun as a shower and carried a gas stove, small fridge-freezer and port-a-loo. </p> <p>Returning home, the couple had an eight-year flirtation with boating before returning to their true love of caravanning. </p> <p>Allsop had begun freelancing for RV magazines when they set out on their third Australian tour in 2001, this time in a custom-built Roadstar caravan with low-power features which allowed them to stay off-road for a week without having to recharge their batteries. They had such a good time that they simply kept going - and going (they've only just settled down after 17 years of spending six months on the road). Denyse retired from medicine to help Allsop write, take photographs and shoot video and he says they "did very well". </p> <p>The couple enjoyed a mixture of freedom camping at staying at caravan parks. </p> <p>"Solitude, having a quiet beach or tropical forest to ourselves was wonderful and yet staying overnight sometimes in a van park was also good. The happy hours, community barbecues and companionship of other campers was very welcome in some van parks."</p> <p>These days, however, Allsop finds himself whether freedom camping in Australia has changed irrevocably - for the worse. </p> <p>The couple have had several bad experiences in freedom campsites near towns where "youths have run rampant on drugs and alcohol.</p> <p>"Nowadays we always make sure there are other campers there and try to get an off-road site by about midday, as they tend to become full in Australia by around 2pm."</p> <p>Some popular sites are crowded with more than 200 vehicles during high season and they are usually packed in like proverbial sardines.</p> <p>"You are parked as close as or closer to your neighbour than in a van park and on a dusty site. You also have no control over noisy neighbours. Apart from the cost, is it worth it?"</p> <p>Have you been freedom camping?</p> <p><em>Written by Lorna Thornber. First appeared on <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stuff.co.nz</span></strong></a>.</em></p>

Domestic Travel

Placeholder Content Image

Lippy dilemma: matte vs gloss?

<p><em><strong>Justine Tyerman takes a walk on the wild side when she dabbles in matte after a life-time of gloss.</strong></em></p> <p>I’ve always been a high-gloss girl, ever since I began using lipstick at the ripe old age of six.</p> <p>But recently I’ve noticed the trend for matte, especially among the young ones at the weddings I’ve attended lately.</p> <p>At first I didn’t like it — I thought the effect was dull and... well... not shiny.</p> <p>But after a while, the matte look grew on me, as fashions often do, and I decided it was sophisticated, dramatic and ultra-chic.</p> <p>I began taking more notice of matte lipsticks, who was wearing them, where, when and why.</p> <p><strong>The world of matte lipsticks</strong></p> <p>Matte lipsticks are often worn in intense colours that look bold and striking. They make a strong statement so you need the confidence...  and the outfits... to go with them.</p> <p>The women wearing them seem to have the ‘out-there’ personality and wardrobe to match the matte look.</p> <p>There’s a “walking on the wild side,” Hollywood siren element about them.</p> <p>On the down side, matte lipsticks can look dry and powdery and accentuate the creases in the lips. They are also more difficult and time-consuming to apply correctly, requiring exfoliation of the lips to get rid of dry skin before applying . . . but then they are more long-lasting than gloss.</p> <p>Gloss lippy is reflective and shiny and brings out the three-dimensionality of the lips.</p> <p>It’s super easy to apply — just whack it on — but it disappears faster, even if you are not talking and eating, and needs to be reapplied more often than matte.</p> <p>The overall effect of gloss is smooth, healthy-looking lips which convey a radiant, fresh, dew-kissed, outdoor, carefree look.</p> <p>Having tentatively experimented with a few mattes, they certainly don’t feel as nice to wear as lip gloss which is naturally hydrating. Incidentally, I don’t advise the tentative approach — if you’ve glossed all your life like I have, a sudden change to matte does not go unnoticed, so be prepared for feedback, negative, positive and uncertain.</p> <p><strong>What does the expert say?</strong></p> <p>I decided to consult an expert on the subject.</p> <p>L’Oréal Paris New Zealand makeup director Lisa Matson says: “If you are wanting to create a retro or old-Hollywood glamour look, matte is the type of lipstick the professionals use as it tends to last longer.</p> <p>“The only downside for matte lipsticks is it can make dry lips look drier. I recommend exfoliating lips before application and applying lip balm to hydrate the skin.</p> <p>“Gloss lipsticks, on the other hand, help to make lips look fuller, soften your make-up look, especially heavy or bold eye make-up. But beware of the colour ‘bleeding’ into fine lines... and your hair getting stuck in the gloss.”</p> <p>Very good point, if you have long hair.</p> <p>And just as I thought I was catching up, apparently the very latest is the nude look. And then there’s the satin effect — somewhere between matte and gloss. Maybe I’ll give that a go as a safer, less risqué intermediary step.</p>

Beauty & Style